Technical version of his other book

I rate this book high because I appreciate hearing the research methods behind the research. However, if you're not wanting to understand the methods that in depth I suggest Gottman's book What Makes Love Last. If you can appreciate the mathematics read this before that book. You'll better understand the research he refers to in that book.

55 people found this helpful

Good book, a lot of math, stats so be prepared.

great book on the science of marriage relationships. Much of it reads like a textbook, so I had to fast forward quite a bit to get to the key take away points. Overall still a great book and I will listen to it again

14 people found this helpful

His best work

I've read most of Gottmans books and love him but when I started reading this one I thought it was so boring. It started slow and went deep into game theory. Half way through though it became my favorite book by him with detailed descriptions of his research and finding and in my option his best published work. This book was so helpful!

14 people found this helpful

Intense and Helpful

This book is super intense in a good way. I did not realize how research driven and mathmatically centered this would be...then again, it is the science of trust not theory. This book takes relationship theories and turns them into predictable data which good because it takes the excuses for behavior away.

There is a lot of terminology to learn or leaf through. If you get caught up in that, the main concepts are still evident and don't let it deter you.

I liked having all the background of what they had to do to study these theories and concepts, in order to, find formulas for prediction based on behavior. It made if more difficult to argue with. It is now a fact that if you do these things you will get those result. Which means if we want a better out come, we have to face certain truths with in ourselves and within others...

But, once we see what we are doi ng and how we are thinking, we can do something about it - turn it around or chose to move on. I found the book helpful because by using research it takes the stories we create out of the equation. Meaning we lose the ability to victimise the experience which allows us to use excuses to behave in less negative ways and to keep perpetuating the problem. I found the book fair to both sides of the party. It's not about you, it's about we.

I really like Gottman's work as it is direct and clear. Thanks!

7 people found this helpful

Very detailed and thorough, but not an easy listen

While the information included was very detailed and thorough, it was a difficult book to listen to because it was very academic and scientific in nature. There was some application, but it got lost amongst the definitions and figures. As long as you go in with the right expectations, you'll be OK, but if, like me, you were expecting more of a how-to in easy to understand layman's terms, you're better off looking elsewhere.

14 people found this helpful

Every married man should read this book.

This book and the 7 principles book have been vital tools in my efforts to save my marriage from my emotional distance and neglect. I recommend it to all men and women who want a committed relationship, period.

27 people found this helpful

Like having tables of data read out loud?

What would have made The Science of Trust better?

It would have helped significantly if the narrator had at least ATTEMPTED to differentiate the voices when reading transcripts of conversations between husbands and wives. Instead, he just keeps reading in his regular voice which is confusing AND annoying. The poor editing job of the written text did not help matters at ALL. This information would have been better presented if it was more concisely presented. It could be cut by at least 25%.

What do you think your next listen will be?

I may avoid Gottman's work in audio format after this... I admire his work as an academic, and wanted to learn more after he was mentioned in Gladwell's books, but clearly I need to be able to visually scan through to get to useful bits.

What didn’t you like about J. Charles’s performance?

I didn't LIKE anything about J. Charles's performance. Lacking in differentiation between "speakers", and my text-to-speech software on my Android has about as much inflection.

What reaction did this book spark in you? Anger, sadness, disappointment?

Disappointment in how crappy an editing job was done. Paragraphs are repeated in several places and the flow of the text is bad. Where the heck were the copy editors in this???

Any additional comments?

Gottman is doing important work into human relationships. Please don't let the poor quality of this specific publication keep you from looking into what he's been doing.

38 people found this helpful

Good insight

The linking of science and research to issues of trust and marriage adds legitimacy. This book is more like a college textbook.

My only complaint is the use of multiple variables with similar terminology got confusing, especially because there was no easy way to recheck meanings. Unlike a textbook, there was no easy way to find definitions or to use a chart/graph to help you follow along.

7 people found this helpful

Trust, more important than you knew

Relationships run into trouble most often when words and actions erode trust. Trust is everything. The Science of Trust is the culmination of 40 years of scientific observations of how couples work together. This should be a high school finishing course although the language level is more difficult.

2 people found this helpful

Great application of math theory to marriage.

Would you listen to The Science of Trust again? Why?

Probably not again because it is 16 hours long.

What was one of the most memorable moments of The Science of Trust?

The Zeigarnik Effect. Understanding this alone may save your marriage.

Which character – as performed by J. Charles – was your favorite?

N/A

Was this a book you wanted to listen to all in one sitting?

No...to long.

Any additional comments?

While this book was written for practitioners, I found it great and a lay person.

5 people found this helpful