The Problem of Democracy
The Presidents Adams Confront the Cult of Personality
Ürünler eklenemedi
Üzgünüz, sepetiniz kapasiteye ulaştığı için bu ürünü ekleyemedik.
Sepete ekleme başarısız oldu.
Lütfen daha sonra tekrar deneyin
İstek Listesine ekleme başarısız oldu.
Lütfen daha sonra tekrar deneyin
İstek listesinden kaldırma başarısız oldu.
Lütfen daha sonra tekrar deneyin
Kütüphaneye ekleme başarısız oldu
Lütfen tekrar deneyin
Podcast takip edilemedi
Podcast takibi bırakma başarısız oldu.
Standard'ı 30 gün ücretsiz edinin
Deneme süresinden sonra aylık 5,99£. Aylık olarak iptal edilir.
The Problem of Democracy
Seslendiren:
Robert Petkoff
21,29£ karşılığında satın al
-
Seslendiren:
-
Robert Petkoff
-
Yazan:
-
Nancy Isenberg
-
Andrew Burstein
How the father and son presidents foresaw the rise of the cult of personality and fought those who sought to abuse the weaknesses inherent in our democracy, from the New York Times bestselling author of White Trash.
John and John Quincy Adams: rogue intellectuals, unsparing truth-tellers, too uncensored for their own political good. They held that political participation demanded moral courage. They did not seek popularity (it showed). They lamented the fact that hero worship in America substituted idolatry for results; and they made it clear that they were talking about Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Andrew Jackson.
When John Adams succeeded George Washington as President, his son had already followed him into public service and was stationed in Europe as a diplomat. Though they spent many years apart--and as their careers spanned Europe, Washington DC, and their family home south of Boston--they maintained a close bond through extensive letter writing, debating history, political philosophy, and partisan maneuvering.
The problem of democracy is an urgent problem; the father-and-son presidents grasped the perilous psychology of politics and forecast what future generations would have to contend with: citizens wanting heroes to worship and covetous elites more than willing to mislead. Rejection at the polls, each after one term, does not prove that the presidents Adams had erroneous ideas. Intellectually, they were what we today call "independents," reluctant to commit blindly to an organized political party. No historian has attempted to dissect their intertwined lives as Nancy Isenberg and Andrew Burstein do in these pages, and there is no better time than the present to learn from the American nation's most insightful malcontents.
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
Henüz yorum yok