Listen free for 30 days

The Agency: A History of the CIA

Narrated by: Hugh Wilford
Length: 11 hrs and 32 mins
Categories: History, American
4.5 out of 5 stars (14 ratings)

£7.99/month after 30 days. Cancel anytime

Summary

There’s a fundamental tension buried within the heart of the CIA’s mission to protect the American people: between democratic accountability and the inherent need for secrecy. Ultimately, it’s US citizens who bear the responsibility of staying informed about what the CIA has done and continues to do.

In these 24 engrossing lectures, explore the roles the CIA has played in recent American history, from the eve of the Cold War against communism to the 21st-century War on Terror. You’ll delve into some of the most remarkable successes, including the sound intelligence CIA spy planes provided during the Cuban Missile Crisis and the admirable performance of the CIA throughout much of the Vietnam War, as well as historic failures, including the agency’s slowness spotting the rise of radical Islamism (including the September 11 attacks).

In many cases, the lectures lead you to consider important questions about the nature of the CIA and its role in shaping modern history. What makes particular regions of the world ripe for the CIA’s attention? How successful are techniques like drone strikes, rendition, and interrogation? How does the CIA compare with its depiction in much of popular culture?

Here, in Professor Wilford’s unbiased exploration of the CIA’s inner workings, is everything you need to come to your own conclusions about what “the Agency” might have done right, what it might have done wrong, and what it should do in the future.

PLEASE NOTE: When you purchase this title, the accompanying PDF will be available in your Audible Library along with the audio.

©2019 The Great Courses (P)2019 The Teaching Company, LLC

What members say

Average customer ratings

Overall

  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    6
  • 4 Stars
    7
  • 3 Stars
    1
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    0

Performance

  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    8
  • 4 Stars
    3
  • 3 Stars
    1
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    0

Story

  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    7
  • 4 Stars
    2
  • 3 Stars
    2
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    0

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Sort by:
Filter by:
  • Overall
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    3 out of 5 stars

Interesting yet superficial

Interesting story and I learned a few new facts but generally too superficial and anecdotal.

Sort by:
Filter by:
  • Overall
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars
Profile Image for BF Palo Alto
  • BF Palo Alto
  • 14-04-19

Interesting history of Our Spies, modest bias

Very enjoyable review of the prehistory and history of the CIA. In general, the professor was unbiased. By the end, some of his anti-CIA views leaked through -- especially when he got into the Bush era. Overall, though, worth the listen.

8 people found this helpful

  • Overall
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    1 out of 5 stars
Profile Image for MissBouquet
  • MissBouquet
  • 26-05-19

Axe to Grind

Wilford certainly has an agenda, but unlike Tim Weiner (Legacy of Ashes), Wilford didn’t do any of the research. Here are a few erroneous points: CIA would monitor people simply for traveling to Russia and Cuba, and then names people who were members of the ACP, but he doesn’t mention that. Wilford said that South Vietnam was overrun in the Tet Offensive, yet we know that the Viet Cong were tactically decimated, but created a strategic victory through information operations. The Tet victory has long been debunked, but it illustrated Wilford lack of source material. Wilford said the CIA was lasing targets in Afghanistan for air strikes in Operation Jawbreaker, however, if Wilford so much as read Jawbreaker, Gary Schoern, he would know that is illegal and the reason they were embedded with Special Forces. Wilford only really gives credit to President Carter for his ability to wield the CIA, which is a fresh viewpoint to be sure.

This series is beneath the Great Courses. Wilford’s depth doesn’t seem to extend beyond the summaries on Wikipedia. If you want to know about the CIA by someone with an axe to grind, read Weiner- at least he did his homework.

11 people found this helpful

  • Overall
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    3 out of 5 stars
Profile Image for Patrick
  • Patrick
  • 14-12-19

Somewhat disappointed

I felt this book spent too much time /energy on what the CIA has done wrong over the last decades. Would have liked to hear more about day to day activities of both ANALYSTS and OPERATORS. The people who are in the trenches every day and MUST be doing a lot of things right. Otherwise how have we succeeded as a nation in the last half century or so. His conclusion does give a more balanced discussion of the two basic parts of the CIA, but a little late and not enough

1 person found this helpful

  • Overall
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    3 out of 5 stars
Profile Image for SS71-92
  • SS71-92
  • 26-10-19

Basic stuff

Old ground suitable for new listeners. Reasonably balanced. No outlandish smears or innuendo. Just OK for those with a more thorough understanding of the Agency.

1 person found this helpful

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    4 out of 5 stars
Profile Image for Trish
  • Trish
  • 21-05-20

Great until the end

I loved this course until the final three chapters when, worked intentionally or unintentionally, the author’s personal bias impacted his ability to objectively communicate post 9-11 history.

  • Overall
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    3 out of 5 stars
Profile Image for Coyote
  • Coyote
  • 13-02-20

Political bias complaining about politicized intelligence

The course started as a dry history lesson. It then picked up again until the modern era where facts are replaced opinions that are politically charged. The professor offers no proof for his belief that President George W. Bush always intended to invade Iraq, and tries to sell the belief that he fabricated evidence. Liberal politicians get a pass.

  • Overall
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    2 out of 5 stars
Profile Image for jerry
  • jerry
  • 02-05-19

liberal version

not my favorite course. professor definitely tells the story from the left. very dissatisfied from this course

5 people found this helpful