Listen free for 30 days

£7.99/month after 30 days. Cancel anytime

Summary

The 2020 Commission Report on the North Korean Nuclear Attacks Against the United States is an exciting piece of "speculative fiction." The novel posits that there was a nuclear attack against the US on March 21, 2020 by North Korea, and that a national bipartisan commission was created to investigate what and how it happened. It's pretty scary stuff.

©2018 Jeffrey Lewis (P)2018 HighBridge, a division of Recorded Books

What listeners say about The 2020 Commission Report on the North Korean Nuclear Attacks Against the United States

Average customer ratings
Overall
  • 4 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    1
  • 4 Stars
    3
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    0
Performance
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    2
  • 4 Stars
    2
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    0
Story
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    2
  • 4 Stars
    2
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    0

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

No Reviews are Available
Sort by:
Filter by:
  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars
Profile Image for Amanda B.
  • Amanda B.
  • 25-02-19

Disturbingly plausible, What Ifs are always open.

If you like Arms Control Wonk, this fiction story from the podcast founder is sure to satisfy. Read well with steady voice acting that didnt mock or drop to impersonation of Trump. Freaky story the was disturbingly plausible, somewhat predictable (as it would be for most ACW listeners) but supremely enjoyable. I appreciated the build up, starting with an accident and ending with
...well, read it yourself!

3 people found this helpful

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars
Profile Image for Just reading
  • Just reading
  • 08-12-18

Interesting story

Thought-provoking, great delivery by the narrator. While some may be put off by the politics, it asks a pointed question about nuclear weapons that is as relevant today as when they were invented. Recommended.

3 people found this helpful

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars
Profile Image for David P. Goode
  • David P. Goode
  • 02-05-19

Powerful read!

Very powerful book. Well written. Terrifying largely due to it's realism. Must read for those interested in US foreign policy, particularly as it relates to the Korean peninsula.

2 people found this helpful

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    4 out of 5 stars
Profile Image for Alan
  • Alan
  • 20-10-18

What a book!

A very plausible “what if” fiction story. For all Americans who think it cannot happen here this is a cold shower wake up call. Sooner or later some country or organization will commit this atrocity and then it will be too late.

5 people found this helpful

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars
Profile Image for brian
  • brian
  • 16-10-18

Speculation, but, well done.

A look at a likely event to happen in the future. Well researched for a fictional war.

6 people found this helpful

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars
Profile Image for Amazon Customer
  • Amazon Customer
  • 28-04-20

Could not stop listening

Well written, well researched, and most importantly so believable that I found myself forgetting this was a work of fiction. I wish it went on for at least one more hour.

1 person found this helpful

  • Overall
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    2 out of 5 stars
Profile Image for Heatherh
  • Heatherh
  • 21-08-19

The anti-technothriller

Most of the critiques I have of the book are already covered by other reviews (The book starts off strong, then loses its way after the missiles start flying; shallow Trump bashing that distracts from the narrative (which is a much stronger attack on the man than recounting him yelling at an aide).
I grew up reading Technothrillers (Clancy published The Hunt from Red October when I was in high school and I bought the follow on books for the next several years in hardcover) and so this book appealed to me as a way to scratch that itch. Here's a worst case scenario acted out. Coming from that angle it was striking how much this book was the polar opposite of a Clancy treatment. The perspective of the soldiers involved in this conflict get very few speaking parts. Military personnel are chess pieces. No one cares what the Rook thinks about what's going on and likewise the author doesn't bother with their stories. Another Clancy fascination, the Secret Service, basically does not exist in this world (a military aide gets in a physical confrontation with the president in a pretty tense moment and no secret service agent is even recorded raising an eyebrow). There's a brief discussion of the Chief of Staff contemplating ordering the Secret Service to bodily load the President on Air Force One but the agents apparently have no agency of their own. The State Department is populated by geniuses and people who carry guns are nonentities, like I said basically the polar opposite of the lense Clancy would view this series of events through, I think that may be some of the disappointment people feel about the book is it seems from the Premise like it would scratch that technothriller itch but it very much does not.
The place where the Trump Bashing got a little tedious for me was the author's incredible fascination with the President's difficulty accepting that his wife was dead. Of all the times when you would cut a person some slack for a bit of denial that's on top of the list. Not to mention there's a lot going on at the moment but instead we're hanging out in a bunker while junior staffers debate who's going to tell the President there's no chance Melania survived.
It's a five star buildup and two star denouement. The discussion of intelligence failures and understandable errors leading up to the crisis really is top notch, but the rest of the book is a disappointment.

1 person found this helpful

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars
Profile Image for DJ W.
  • DJ W.
  • 08-04-19

A terrifying look at a possible future.

The author obviously knowledgeable about nuclear proliferation , military and political realities of the US AND Korean government. He uses this knowledge to tell write a cautionary tale of the possibilities of a nuclear event. He uses the real names of key government officials and does a good job of political profiling their likely actions and personalities. I read about 40 nonfiction books a year on policy and this work of fiction will stand out. I enjoyed it.

1 person found this helpful

  • Overall
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    4 out of 5 stars
Profile Image for Jimmy Beans J
  • Jimmy Beans J
  • 23-03-21

A nice little story colored by partisanship

Ok for beginners I’m an independent voter. I never thought I’d need to profess this prior to writing a review but eh..... these times. So this book is actually quite riveting but the author can barely hide his disdain for Donald Trump and it gets rather old. Don’t get me wrong I’m glad the last four years are over but I’m sick of the whining and the “it’s Trump’s fault” politics. This book reads like a Hollywood idea of Trumps actions and refuses to give him a modicum of credulity or respect. This is the only thing that pulls one away from the realism the book otherwise provides. Basically I can say the author let his political views distort an otherwise really good book and quite frankly it’s rather disgusting. Good job Lewis you partisan d. But honestly it’s better than some of the more weird and nationalistic grossly patriotic and equally partisan trash that guys like Paterson and the other post apocalypse and survival writers have been churning out for years.

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    1 out of 5 stars
Profile Image for Carl Ward
  • Carl Ward
  • 21-09-20

Strong Start Very Implausible Finish

The first half builds a reasonably realistic pre war scenario. However, out of nowhere the final chapters of the book focus on Trump hating. This much overdone assault on the President comes at the expense of a completely failed ending.
The focus on demeaning the President is not mentioned at anytime in the previews. I believe this to be unfair to the potential buyer/reader..