Listen free for 30 days

Quine on the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction

Narrated by: A. Zens
Length: 37 mins
3.0 out of 5 stars (2 ratings)

£7.99/month after 30 days. Cancel anytime

Summary

W.V.O. tried to prove that no statement is necessarily true. In this work, Quine's argument is stated, analyzed, and shown to be a broken argument for a false conclusion. It is shown that necessary truths are as important as empirical truths to the empirical sciences, the reason being that, without necessary truths, there is no way to organize or interpret data. It comes to light that, in addition to being false, every form of extreme empiricism (e.g. Dewey's pragmatism, Wittgenstein's verificationism, Comte's positivism) is so incoherent that it cannot be clearly stated without thereby being refuted.

©2016 John-Michael Kuczynski (P)2016 John-Michael Kuczynski

What listeners say about Quine on the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction

Average customer ratings
Overall
  • 3 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    1
  • 4 Stars
    0
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    1
Performance
  • 3 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    1
  • 4 Stars
    0
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    1
Story
  • 3 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    1
  • 4 Stars
    0
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    1

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Sort by:
Filter by:
  • Overall
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    1 out of 5 stars

Unusable

May this audio article should have come with a pdf transcript. It sounded as if it was spoken by a computer - no intonation to help grasp its meanings. The summary on Amazon suggests that necessary truths are analytic but this is not what Quine is arguing. Logical, a priori or necessary truths can be synthetic.

Sort by:
Filter by:
  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars
Profile Image for Honest Reviewer
  • Honest Reviewer
  • 26-11-16

genius

What made the experience of listening to Quine on the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction the most enjoyable?

Adam Zens. The man is a legend in his own time.

What was the most compelling aspect of this narrative?

What wasn't compelling about it, is more like it!

What does A. Zens bring to the story that you wouldn’t experience if you just read the book?

Focus

What’s the most interesting tidbit you’ve picked up from this book?

That K is a great writer.

Any additional comments?

I love this narrator.