Theodoric the Great: The Life and Legacy of the Ostrogothic King Who Ruled Italy after the Fall of Rome kapak görseli

Theodoric the Great: The Life and Legacy of the Ostrogothic King Who Ruled Italy after the Fall of Rome

 Önizleme
SINIRLI SÜRELİ TEKLİF

3 ay boyunca aylık £0,99

Bu fırsatı yakala
Teklif 29 Ocak 2026 tarihinde saat 23:59 GMT itibarıyla sona erer.
Diğer seçenekler

Theodoric the Great: The Life and Legacy of the Ostrogothic King Who Ruled Italy after the Fall of Rome

Yazan: Charles River Editors
Seslendiren: KC Wayman
Bu fırsatı yakala

3 aydan sonra aylık 8,99 £. Aylık olarak iptal edilir. Teklif 29 Ocak 2026 tarihinde saat 23:59 GMT itibarıyla sona erer.

7,99£ karşılığında satın al

7,99£ karşılığında satın al

This Season's Biggest Deal | £0.99/mo for 3 months + £10 Audible bonus

£5.99/mo after 3 months - terms apply. Cancel monthly
Özet
 The collapse of the Western Roman Empire in 476 A.D. is well-documented and often used to separate antiquity from the medieval era, bringing about widespread changes on the continent that led to modern Europe as people recognize it today. But that is where the historical consensus ends, because the collapse of Rome led to centuries of wars, raids, and the successive rises and falls of short-lived kingdoms. The Goths played an integral part in the history of Europe during this time, and they remain among the most notorious and controversial groups in history. By the 4th century A.D., the Goths were among the prominent barbarian groups who became a threat to the Roman Empire, but they also had contacts with the Romans well before then, and they even traded for a time. The two branches of the Goths that are best known, the Visigoths and Ostrogoths, stared down the Western Roman Empire as it neared its collapse and supplanted it with a kingdom in Italy in the 5th and 6th centuries.Among the Goths, the Ostrogothic leader Theodoric is among the most famous thanks to his deeds and reign in Italy, but few rulers from that era are harder to pin down. Although he was a Goth and an Arian, from 493-526 he governed a population that was predominantly Roman and Catholic. He grew up as a hostage in Constantinople, his warriors made him king, and he came to Italy at the behest of Emperor Zeno to depose Odoacer. Once he had triumphed, he bestowed upon the peninsula a period of peace and stable government, choosing to present himself as the protector of civilitas and the old institutions. As a result, the praetorian prefecture, the Senate, the tax system, and the laws of the Western Roman Empire all technically continued under his rule, but he has never been considered a Roman king or emperor.Moreover, the ancient sources who wrote about him painted very different portraits, each colored by their own politics and religion, so any historical account of his life must begin with the sources, which should be read with some suspicion. The main witness for the royal chancery is Cassiodorus, whose Variae collects letters written while he served as quaestor, master of offices, and praetorian prefect. He published these letters during the Gothic War, and their polished rhetoric clearly serves to celebrate the harmony between the Goths and the Romans and justify the senators who had collaborated with the Gothic kings. The cleric Ennodius went further, describing Theodorics reign as a golden age (aureum saeculum) in which cities were reborn and peace was restored. He elevated the king to the level of the Roman emperors. The writer of Anonymus Valesianus, on the other hand, wrote that the first 30 years of Theodoric's reign were worthy of praise, but his final years were marked by tyranny and oppression against Catholics. Perhaps most interestingly, the Byzantine writer Procopius of Caesarea, who wrote during the era of Justinians attempts to unify the Roman Empire, granted Theodoric the qualities of a true emperor (logō tyrannos, ergō basileus).Modern assessments of Theodorics reign have followed separate paths. John Moorhead offers a reconstruction built on Theodorics political pragmatism, stressing the Ostrogoths continuity with late Roman structures and the delicate balance between the Gothic military elite and the senatorial aristocracy, a model that did not outlive its founder because the two groups never truly merged and because of dynastic tensions. Jonathan J. Arnold took a different view, arguing that the Ostrogothic kingdom should be understood as a genuine restoration of the Western Roman Empire, in which Theodoric ruled as princeps Romanus and the Italians accepted the Goths as members of a new Roman army.©2026 Charles River Editors (P)2026 Charles River Editors
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
Henüz yorum yok