Then one day Roy asked his timid friend: "You ever killed anything?" And from that moment on, the two were bound together in a game too terrifying to imagine...and too irresistible to stop.
©2008 Dean Koontz; (P)2008 Brilliance Audio
"Fearsome....terrifying." (Chicago Sun-Times)
an amateurish story with a slightly annoying voice actor. changing either one though would not help much. felt like this was written in a week.
This was superb, very simple story but excellently read and I found myself gripped from start to finish.
There are characters in this book that you will want to shake by the ears... there are others that you will want to give a big hug too... Really, really good
"Another Koontz hit!!"
I have always found Dean Koontz to be an entertaining writer. He does not fail to entertain the reader and kept me wanting to read more in this novel once again. Although he stretches a couple of the scenes to be unbelievable, he recovers to keep me involved in the story and at times I had difficulty stopping to return at a later time.
The book wasn't so bad, but the narrator was agony! He read much too slow and too deliberately, sounded like he was reading a pre-school story to children...for 7 hours!
Did Dean Koontz really write this? Maybe the narrator had something to do with it, as it was like listening to 7 hours of Gilbert Gottfried. I wanted everyone to meet with a gruesome end. I just hated every character even the whiny main character who spent most of the time arguing with himself. But I really wanted to wring Roy's neck. Badly.
This was disappointing in 2 respects - first, it lacked the usual "Koontzian" flare (written in 1980); second, the narrator was annoying to me. If you're expecting a nailbiter, pass on this book.
"An unusual Koontz"
An unusual Koontz. The characters are teens, there is no supernatural intervention, and there is (in this case thankfully) no dog. The narration was very good, and the story was interesting. This kept me involved in the story, but it was not Koontz at his best. There is a lot of setup followed by a swift conclusion. It was missing some of the high tension character development that Koontz does so well. It is still better than most in the genre.
"not that great"
I am a die hard, true fan of everything Dean Koontz, however this is probably my least favorite of his works. I think the narrator is what made it so bad. Over acting and the over emphasis of dialog was bad. I found myself fast forwarding through a lot of the story.
this was not my favorite. the plot really didn't grab me like I had hoped
"Yep -- it's Koontz...what's the name on the cover?"
A Koontz book, but written under a pseudonym. Why do they do that? Are they embarrassed about a work? An unusual Koontz work, this one...the characters are teens, there is no supernatural intervention, and I thought it would be about the usual teen age angst of growing up. But, this book is about Psycho in making... It was suspenseful. That the main [teen] character was able to set up such a complex ending is a bit baffling; it made good reading anyway.
"Was this really written by Dean Koontz?"
A bully and a whiny friend. Too much talk of dead animals and naked woman.
"Don't waste a credit on this one"
This has to be the worst Dean Koontz story of all time. It was one of a very few that I hadn't read and I was very disappointed that it was so boring and sexually descriptive.
Report Inappropriate Content