In How to Think: The Liberal Arts and Their Enduring Value, Professor Michael D. C. Drout gives an impassioned defense and celebration of the value of the liberal arts. Charting the evolution of the liberal arts from their roots in the educational system of Ancient Rome through the Middle Ages and to the present day, Drout shows how the liberal arts have consistently been "the tools to rule", essential to the education of the leaders of society. Offering a reasoned defense of their continuing value, Drout also provides suggestions for improving the state of the liberal arts in contemporary society.
©2013 Michael D.C. Drout (P)2013 Crescite Group, LLC
Professor Drout takes up a critical issue- the value of a liberal arts education. He looks at common critiques and does a good job of evaluating both sides of each argument. His most exceptional lecture by a large margin is 'what is wrong with the liberal arts and how to fix it'. It is worth purchasing this lecture series just to listen to this brilliant analysis of how political and social orthodoxy within the liberal arts academy have contributed to making liberal arts scholarship stagnant, if not in some cases moribund.The weakness in Drout's lecture series, however, is that he fails to make a convincing case for the importance of a liberal arts education. He argues that it gives graduates 'the tools to rule' (be good leaders and managers) and the skills to solve or at least wrestle with complex problems, but he fails to really explain how a liberal arts education can lead to these outcomes. His main case study is that of the old English epic poem Beowulf....he demonstrates how a deep understanding of this work requires a rich background in history, language and literary criticism, in addition to well developed research and analysis skills and a multi- disciplinary perspective...all knowledge and skills developed in a liberal arts degree programme. However, what is missing is the link between having these critical skills and the solving of ( or mitigating of) complex modern political, economic and social problems. He asserts the link but does not make a sufficient or strong enough argument to convince listeners of the true value of the liberal arts. In some ways he does what he criticises other liberal arts scholars of doing.....making strong assertions with insufficient empirical evidence. Without a shadow of a doubt, a broad based, well taught liberal arts education is the best way to develop critical thinking skills, cultural awareness, self - awareness, confidence, and problem solving abilities.....I just wish Professor Drout had done a better job of explaining and demonstrating why this is the case.Lots of good food for thought though.
A follow-up lecture series would help make a stronger case.
"A defense of the Liberal Arts"
If you've heard any of Drout's other lecture series, or even just read their customer reviews, you know that Drout is one of the best lecturers available on Audible. In my opinion, this series is every bit as good as his others, both in content and presentation. Drout is, as always, engaging, erudite, thought-provoking, and funny. Maybe the subject matter doesn't have as broad an appeal, but if you're actually interested in a discussion, defense, or critique of the liberal arts, this is a good one.
In case it needs to be said, pay attention to the subtitle and the description, not just the title. Here's a description of the eight individual lectures:
Lecture 1: Where the Liberal Arts came from. Lecture 2: How the sciences split off from the liberal arts. Lecture 3: The liberal arts as "the tools to rule." Lecture 4: Can the liberal arts make you a better person? Lecture 5: The best reasons for studying the liberal arts: Solving complex problems, and preserving and transmitting culture. Lecture 6: Case study: Beowulf. Lecture 7: What's wrong with the liberal arts, and how to fix it. Lecture 8: Answering the critics of the liberal arts.
"A Passionate Defense of the Liberal Arts"
Prof. Drout is an enthusiastic speaker, and his passion for the liberal arts comes through in this lecture series. His insights on how to connect the past to the modern world are thought-provoking, to say the least. Admittedly, he's already preaching to the converted on this one, but I always welcome a solid, concrete argument for preserving and studying the liberal arts vs. the somewhat ethereal and half-baked ideas I sometimes hear. If this is a topic you're inclined to look into, this series is most definitely worth your time and attention.
"11 out of 12 ain't bad"
I surmise that this course seemed interesting in preparation, but in the presentation, the material falls flat.
The material is just not compelling. True as it is, this material sounds like it is more suited for a peer conference where humanities grad students can come and get some good talking points for why their disciplines matter. As a general course, it fails to inspire.
The redeeming quality is that even when Drout fails to engage me, he is still very enjoyable--and erudite.
Don't let this negative review keep you from trying any of Drout's other courses, especially Way With Words (the first one), Anglo-Saxon History, and History of English Language. Drout is a really fine teacher and his other courses are very inspiring. He is one of the Modern Scholars' most popular presenters for a reason.
OK but not the gravitas of a Schutt or a Kreeft.
I'm an advocate of the Liberal Arts (LA) and that's why I was shocked that this lecture series actually made me question that.
I came into this audiobook needing no convincing of the value of LA (to individuals and to society) but was really just looking for some additional inspiration. The audio failed in that regard; it sounds like the standard routines a LA teacher would give to skeptical parents who don't want to spend money on their child's college tuition at LA college.
If you know some thing about, and see the value in, the LA, don't waste your money on this course.
I hate to say it, but as a top level demonstration of LA in action (it should be right, he's the Professor?) then it was a poor advertisement; the rhetoric was weak and the entire lecture series felt like an over confident sophomore's monologue in the cafeteria.
"Great for me"
I listened to it twice, the second time was much better. Finally I have a clearer understanding of the term "liberal arts," its purpose and utility. I will listen to it again.
The first audiobook that I've finally finished. I'm gonna listen over and over again at this outstanding lecture on this serious topic.
"I can't get enough of Professor Drout!"
There is something so satisfying about how Drout teaches you while teaching you. He takes the information he's sharing, throws in historical representations os the data and then rounds it out with full explanations of every bit of information he shares (even adding defining comments at the ends seemingly random rabbit holes and tangents). I'm always as amazed as I am enlightened.
"Performance was a bit too loose."
I really enjoyed the argument and found the author's general ideas and conclusions to be interesting and valuable. I found his spoken lecture to be too loose for my taste, though. It could just be bad timing; I just finished listening to a Modern Scholar lecture on the history of China and East Asian civilization, and the lecturer was one of the best I've been heard. I appreciated Professor Drout's ideas, but I think his speech wasn't as well prepared or organized as it could have been.
Excellent listen. Amazing was the experience that I encountered as Professor Michael D. C. Drout navigated the subject!!!!!
Report Inappropriate Content
If you find this review inappropriate and think it should be removed from our site, let us know. This report will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.