In this course of lectures, Professor Hadley Arkes seeks to recall the classic connection between morality and law. For law works by sweeping away personal choice and private judgment and replacing them with a public rule, meant to be enforced on everyone. And that state of affairs can be justified only if the law can, in fact, appeal to an understanding of the things that are more generally or universally right or wrong.
©2012 Crescite Group (P)2012 Recorded Books
There are no listener reviews for this title yet.
"Truth and Objectivity Work for the Common Good"
This book correlates with the everyday decisions and perspectives we have to deal with where we need to operate in truth and for the common good. He gives a superior and scholarly understanding of what is significant in our communications and decisions rather than rigidly trying to perform under rules and regulations. We don't live in a perfect world or deal with people who will understand us if we just say what is on our mind, or how we feel so we need discernment. Above all we need to come to a place of discernment that is objective and based on truth, something that is above our natural inclinations.
This is a philosophical dissertation and it is so practical and understandable as well as being something one can put into practice. I love the enlightenment he gave.
Very lucid and teachable approach. He puts the information on the practical level.
Yes! I listened to part 1 and 2 throughout the day and then listened to them again.
I am very adept at Philosophy and Theology and well educated in both though I do not have a doctorate. I found this series very relevant to life rather than just education and theoretical. I appreaciate the matter of morals and laws coming together rather than just law ruling.
great great great great great great great great great great wonderful awesome excellent fabulous amazing superb
"You get a little lost in the logic"
Professor Hadley Arkes has a lovely voice and his arguments and logic are excellent, however my level of intellect isn't quite up to his. Yes I agree with his line but that is the way I have been brought up and now that is who I am. From what I can tell it is mainly about freedom, from slavery, self determination, to think without being forced not to. I don't know how this relates exactly to the rule of law, but it was wonderful to listen to Pro. Hadley Arkes speak. Perhaps after I have made some other political/law books under my belt I might appreciate him and this series of lectures better.
"Not very enjoyable."
I was able to listen to the whole book, but I'm not running to buy the next one. I feel a little smarter because of this book and learned a little. It was slightly boring, but not enough to stop listening. I don't know if I'll buy the next one; I have plenty of more interesting books in my sights.
"Not for me"
The religious tone
I switched off before gathering an opinion on this
I attempted several times to return and get a credit without success
"Just for men?"
As a highly educated man, Professor Hadley Arkes has decided to continue the privileging of men. Although I initially tried to ignore the constant male pronoun of 'he', 'his' and the term, 'man', it was too much in the middle of Chapter Two when he stated, '... some men are invested with the authority to impose their judgements on everyone else with the force of law'. Clearly he is aware that there are female legislators. His decision to write and speak this way must be made with his full knowledge that sexist language perpetuates discrimination against women. This prejudice prevents me from listening further, and stands in stark contrast to 'The Modern Scholar: Philosophy of Mind' by Andrew Pessin which is characterised by inclusive language and a joy to hear.
The Modern Scholar: Philosophy of Mind' by Andrew Pessin.
Sexist language which infers deeper prejudice.
It would be great if Audible could ask authors to ensure their language is inclusive.
"Not for me"
I made an two errors worth mentioning. The title First Principle & Natural Law suggested a book dealing with law of Physics which was what I was looking for. It wasn't. The second was in listening to the subject "Political Philosophy" I found the accent and manner of the narrator rather unappealing and pedantic. I suggest anyone buying this title give it a careful listen beforehand to be sure its what you want.
Something in my intended area of interest. Physical Science.
Tone and manner. Accent.
Report Inappropriate Content
If you find this review inappropriate and think it should be removed from our site, let us know. This report will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.