Neglected and mistrusted by Catholic Europe, and absorbed in its own problems, help was too little and too late in coming.When the young Mehmet II became Sultan of the Ottoman Turks in 1451, few expected this quiet young man to be rash enough to disturb the simmering peace which his father had maintained with the Greeks for decades. They were soon to learn otherwise. Though the city was bravely defended by 7,000 soldiers, the odds were hopeless and the outcome increasingly clear to the beleaguered Emperor Constantine XI, who courageously joined the last of the desperate fighting...never to be seen again.
Though Constantinople was gloriously resurrected and had a population 10 times greater within 30 years, its magnificent Byzantine Civilization was over. Its inhabitants came under the yoke of Islam while thousands who could afford to, fled to the West, bringing valuable knowledge which hastened the flowering of the Italian Renaissance. Listen as one of the most poignant stories in European history unfolds.Listeners are encouraged to go online to Wikipedia for maps of the conflict in order to get a grasp of place names.
©1965 Cambridge University; (P)2009 Audio Connoisseur
Professional with life long interest in Ancient History.
For an armchair historian this is not an easy listen. Way too many names. Often lost the thread. I did not finish this listen and am on the lookout for something else
Fascinating breakdown of the events leading up to and after. Loved it. Would gladly listen to it again.
An exciting and factual story about little known history
No one character; as history, especially one that describes an event with virtually innumerable important people, it's hard to like just one "character". The emperor, Mehmet the Conqueror, the Genoese, the Venetians...they all, in their own way win your admiration.
The actual siege and who they held out against so many odds with so few defenders.
No extreme reaction, but it made me sad and gave me grade admiration for such heroic people.
"A sad story"
Although I must admit I do not care much for the narator, (his voice put me to sleep) this short book about the final moment of the Eastern Roman empire is pretty touching. My only objection has been the subject is a little too narrow, it'd have been more interesting if it was about the entire history of the Byzantine, nonetheless, I give it 3.5/5 stars for clarity and pathos.
The Turks come out of this book pretty barbaric, it should be born in mind that this was an era where witches and heretics were burning on the stake, so while we admire the roman heroism, try not to let cultural prejudices cloud our eyes.
"Everyone should read the book for my opinion"
I like that not only the battle is explained but also at least some of the background that let to the fall of the Constantinople.
And yes I'd even like to know some more details about the progress of the Ottoman invasion of the Byzantine empire.
The last moments of the empire were definitely the most memorable.
I think he was more or less OK but he definitely isn't my favorite.
I prefer narrators like Kevin Collins. He narrated Lone Survivor about Navy SEAL Marcus Luttrell. This guy really has a very nice Texan accent. And you definitely don't get sleepy listening to him.
On the other hand I had some problems to hear Charlton Griffin's narration. I mostly listen these books while hiking.
I think The Fall of Constantinople would be just fine.
Well yes. I like to read and listen about history and I can see the history repeats again and again. People never learn unfortunately.
The fall of the both Roman empires really teach us what's happening with our civilization right now. And we make the same mistakes again.
In this particular book we can learn that the Turks / Muslims settled the land around the Constantinople to that point that they became a majority. And at that point they became the landlords. The European powers were not interesting to draw them out of the country. There were to many of them.
So it's the same with our civilization right now. More and more Muslims are coming to our lands. There are cities where they are already a majority. Like in the UK. And they don't want to assimilate. I know that in UK there were some schools where these Muslims stopped practicing the official school programs and started teaching Muslim religion only.
Now we should ask our self. Do we really want that our children will be forced to wear burkas? Do we really like that our will be forced to learn about Quran only? Well that happened to Byzantines because they really didn't care.
Some may say there are different times now. I even saw such a comment here for this book. Not true. We can see what's happening in Syria and Iraq right now. And yes. If you study any Quran you will see these terrorists are the true Muslims.
This book really has no audience. I am familiar with Runciman as a historian - although a respected scholar of the medieval Mediterranean, his writing style is turgid. I had to start over the first three chapters three times each because I kept falling asleep, and I was listening to the book for a specific academic purpose!
The only chapters that actually captured the imagination were the central ones, in which he narrates the actual fall of the city. The chapters leading up to 1453 and those describing the aftermath could only be interesting to an academic or someone truly passionate about the topic.
Charleton Griffin's narration was abysmal - pompous and annoyingly "Oxford don" - yet he did not take the time to learn to pronounce Turkish and regularly mispronounced Italian words and names as well. There is no excuse for this.
The book, to which I wanted to listen because of my own 30-month sojourn in Istanbul and also because I wanted to use it for a course I am teaching this fall, was an extreme disappointment. It certainly would not entertain the average reader, regardless of his or her educational background.
"I didn't finsh it"
I chose this book because I usually like both history and historical fiction, but this book included so many dry parts that I lost interest and stopped listening.
I'm not sure that Runciman could have changed the facts of history. But, either they were written in too much of a textbook voice, or the narrator presented the book as if droning from a textbook.
Report Inappropriate Content