Consider the intense and rapid changes that transformed the political, social, and economic struggles of the world during the 20th century: the first flight and space flight, the Manhattan Project and the welfare state, Nietzsche and Freud, the Great Depression and inflation, moving pictures and home computers, the Cold War and terrorism - and war and peace.
These 48 comprehensive lectures examine this extraordinary history and provide a multidisciplinary understanding of how the modern world came to be and how democracy has emerged as a political ideal, although the parameters of a truly democratic world order are still being vigorously contested. You'll see how the 20th century can be read as a history of ideas, and how those ideas both influenced events and were in turn influenced by them to shape today's world.
Professor Radcliff not only distills political and economic trends from a century of world history, but she explains them with clarity, drawing on other disciplines as necessary to make key points come alive. She defines the perspective of this course as including what she calls the "Enlightenment Project" - the adoption of liberal, democratic, rationalist principles in much of the world - while emphasizing the unresolved nature of the struggle for democracy.
As you move chronologically through the century, you'll explore a range of ideas in depth, including the "crisis of meaning" unleashed by World War I, the different approaches of Fascism and Communism to organizing and mobilizing masses, and how art provided a window into the psychological forces swirling through public life. Detailed case studies also bring history's ideas alive.
PLEASE NOTE: When you purchase this title, the accompanying reference material will be available in your Library section along with the audio.
©2004 The Teaching Company, LLC (P)2004 The Great Courses
17th Century Heretic
I thought this lecture series would be a history of democracy in the 20th century. Was that stupid of me? Having listened to several lectures now, it appears to be more of a general discussion of ideas, public consciousness and philosophy. If thats what you want then this may well be the right audiobook for you. Lecturer comes across as very clear, intelligent and sympathetic with to my ear a very pleasant voice. I didnt notice her saying "in other words" repeatedly, but she certainly sighs alot. Take a year off Professor? Sounds like you are working too hard.
Nobody ,I am gla i never attended any of her lectures, her presentation is very poor and i am not surewe are bothrelating to the same century. I would not recomend it to any student or to the casual listern, it not the subject because I study it, it the long pauses ans, EEERRRSSS,. However commisioned need there head examined.
Some body how can present a piece of history with emphasis on the interesting and factual parts
Nothing, she should not be allowed to teach History, her method of droning on put people of History for Life
Dont commision any more from her
"Philosophical differences aside, well worth it!"
There are several warnings I would give to someone considering this investment in time. This is a course of 48 lectures delivered by a professor who is relatively monotone and does not convey warmth or enthusiasm the way most people do. I felt that I got used to the way she uses tone and I got over it. If you can't do monotone, you should consider whether this course is for you. Very long course, but commensurate with scope. Despite the length, the topics are treated at a high level. Most readers will find a percentage of lectures that they feel they know better than the professor. You may find her viewpoint in some lectures to be a bit naive, very liberal, or flat out wrong. If this puts you off and you are a conservative or libertarian, you may have difficulty finishing the course. Personally I found the perspective and the focus on "democracy" to be incredibly interesting. She is unabashedly focused on the struggle for democracy even though we find democracy to be in quite a bit of trouble recently, and our founders were not very sanguine about the future of democracy and thus designed a republic. Democracy may not fit in all places, and it may at the end of the day not be the correct system to manage the affairs of human beings, but I think most alternative anchors for a course of the 20th century would fail miserably. Like it or not most in the US believe in the living constitution as well as the Tocquevillian tumble towards equality in all things. Conservatives and libertarians who can accept democracy as an anchor should be able to enjoy and gain insight into how liberals view the 20th century. The broad scope is reflected in the lectures. I would recommend that you Google great courses pamela radcliff 20th century and look at the lecture list. Most non-expert history buffs will find alot here that they will enjoy. Highly recommended. Will challenge your perspective and help you understand better the liberal viewpoint. There was also a PDF course guidebook that I found while googling. I actually believe these guidebooks are essential for many of these courses. Not essential for this one as she sticks to her notes which are very related to the guidebook. If you find the guidebook it may also help you decide if this course is for you.
"Below the usual standard of the Great Courses"
I've been listening to a lot of the Great Courses and this professor's presentation was noticeably below the usual standard. The presentation improves over time but gives the impression of inexperience or lack of confidence.
Disappointment and frustration. How any historian or sociologist can literally gloss over the first world war in minutes but then devote hours to insignificant and esoteric movements, and credit them with the greatest influence, is beyond me. And sorry to be pedantic but any professor who covers WW1 in any way should know the correct pronunciation of the Battle of the Somme.
The course has a somewhat Marxist Feminist flavour to it combined with that 'every other possible angle was already taken for my PhD' which leaves the author placing a disproportionate focus minor themes and influences. The significance given to artists and their supposed influence on societies is quite ridicules.
"Refreshingly Global, Wonderfully Interpretive"
This is an excellent history course for a number of reasons. The first is that it makes an attempt at global coverage, which is rare. We hear about Asian and African and South American countries that are often ignored in Western-centric modern histories. Another is that it is interpretive -- not merely stating facts but identifying larger themes and tendencies as well. It also tackles social and cultural events and changes of the century, giving a history of ideas, not merely politics -- and the 20th century is a time when ideas were very powerful. Finally its nice to hear a woman's perspective on the 20th century; there seem to be very few female lecturers on history in the Great Courses' repertoire, which may be representative of the field writ large, but is nonetheless disappointing from such a great company.
As far as performance goes, Radcliff -- just like all the other Great Courses people -- is a professor and not an orator, but she has a fine, NPR-ish voice that makes for very decent listening. Someone else pointed out that she says "in other words" (or its equivalents) a lot, which she does -- but the re-wording that follows always helps to elucidate the point, so I can't consider it a fault.
"Lots of information not covered by our right wing"
Media coverage of these more recent events has smacked of right wing nationalism. It's great to hear the facts delivered so articulately. During the presentations of democracies that have failed, I couldn't help but see remarkable parallels to the United States today. Pretty scary that WE THE PEOPLE have allowed our country to be sold out from underneath us
"No more 'other words' please"
Overall, a good course with many useful insights. My only complaint is the lecturer's apparent inability to quit saying 'in other words.' She says this a minimum of 5 times per lecture, sometimes many more. In one span of about a minute and a half, she said it 3 times. As annoying as a Valley Girl's 'like' or the early John Denver's 'far out.' Stop It!!!!!
Report Inappropriate Content