America began, we are often told, with the Founding Fathers, the men who waged a revolution and created a unique place called the United States. We may acknowledge the early Jamestown and Puritan colonists and mourn the dispossession of Native Americans, but we rarely grapple with the complexity of the nation's pre-revolutionary past.
In this pathbreaking revision, Daniel Richter shows that the United States has a much deeper history than is apparent - that far from beginning with a clean slate, it is a nation with multiple pasts that stretch back as far as the Middle Ages, pasts whose legacies continue to shape the present.
Exploring a vast range of original sources, Before the Revolution spans more than seven centuries and ranges across North America, Europe, and Africa. Richter recovers the lives of a stunning array of peoples - Indians, Spaniards, French, Dutch, Africans, English - as they struggled with one another and with their own people for control of land and resources. Their struggles occurred in a global context and built upon the remains of what came before. Gradually and unpredictably, distinctive patterns of North American culture took shape on a continent where no one yet imagined there would be nations called the United States, Canada, or Mexico.
By seeing these trajectories on their own dynamic terms, rather than merely as a prelude to independence, Richter's epic vision reveals the deepest origins of American history.
©2012 Dr. Daniel Richter (P)2012 Gildan Media LLC
"Once every quarter-century or so, a book of great sweep and synthetic sophistication bursts onto the scene to recast our understanding of early American history. This masterful study, with its startling comparisons of European patterns of conquest, colonization, chaos, and cultural convergence, is a must." (Gary Nash, author of The Liberty Bell)
There are no listener reviews for this title yet.
"Mis-leading summary, you know at the introduction."
A real history instead of a made up one.
It is appalling that Audible allowed such a misleading summary. The introduction states right off that it is a right wing religious agenda interpretation of history the way they want it to be, instead of the way it is. The sad part is, that some people will beleive this tripe. I wouldn't burn it, as my first reaction, but rather if I was a educator, use it to show how history can be manipulated to further a cause.
Report Inappropriate Content